---
title: "Will AI Replace Judges? (2026)"
description: "BLS rates judges' exposure to AI as high. What that means, which parts of the work AI touches, and the 2025–2035 outlook (+2.8% projected)."
canonical: "https://nuecareer.com/careers/will-ai-replace-judges"
last-updated: "2026-10-15T08:19:32.066Z"
---

# Will AI Replace Judges? (2026)

**Short answer:** Not replaced, but changed. BLS rates the exposure as high, so AI can help with a real share of the work, yet it still projects employment to grow.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics places judges in its high AI exposure category, above the middle of the pack: a substantial share of the work overlaps with what AI can do. BLS projects employment to change by +2.8% over 2025–2035, against 3.5% for all occupations, with about 800 openings a year.

| Measure | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BLS relative AI exposure | High | BLS Employment Projections, AI exposure categories |
| NueCareer AI-resilience score | 16/100 | NueCareer analysis of O\*NET 31.0 Database |
| Projected employment change | +2.8% | BLS EP 2025–2035 |
| Openings a year | 800 | BLS EP 2025–2035 |
| Median annual wage | $153,990 | BLS OEWS May 2025 |

## Exposure categories

| BLS category | Occupations |
| --- | --- |
| Low | 203 |
| Moderate | 194 |
| High (this job) | 190 |
| Very high | 199 |

Exposure means AI could be or has been used to assist with or complete some of the work. BLS says it does not imply job loss, productivity gains, automation probability or wage effects. Method: https://www.bls.gov/emp/publications/ai-exposure-categories.htm

## What holds up

- Performing for or working directly with the public: 4.6/5 (O\*NET work activity importance)
- Face-to-face discussions: 4.9/5 (O\*NET work context)
- Dealing with the public: 4.7/5 (O\*NET work context)
- Making decisions and solving problems: 4.9/5 (O\*NET work activity importance)

## What AI reaches first

- Processing information: 4.4/5 (O\*NET work activity importance)
- Documenting/recording information: 4.0/5 (O\*NET work activity importance)
- Evaluating information to determine compliance with standards: 4.5/5 (O\*NET work activity importance)
- Getting information: 4.8/5 (O\*NET work activity importance)

## O\*NET tasks

- Monitor proceedings to ensure that all applicable rules and procedures are followed.
- Read documents on pleadings and motions to ascertain facts and issues.
- Rule on admissibility of evidence and methods of conducting testimony.
- Advise attorneys, juries, litigants, and court personnel regarding conduct, issues, and proceedings.
- Preside over hearings and listen to allegations made by plaintiffs to determine whether the evidence supports the charges.
- Issue arrest warrants.

## FAQ

**Will AI replace judges?**

Not replaced, but changed. BLS rates the exposure as high, so AI can help with a real share of the work, yet it still projects employment to grow. BLS defines exposure as AI being able to assist with or complete some of the work, and says it does not imply job loss, productivity gains or wage effects. BLS projects employment to change by +2.8% over 2025–2035, against 3.5% for all occupations, with about 800 openings a year.

**How exposed are judges to AI?**

BLS sorts 786 occupations into four relative categories: low, moderate, high and very high. Judges are in the high category, alongside 189 other occupations. The categories combine five public measures of where AI could be or already is used, and they compare occupations with each other rather than giving an absolute risk.

**What parts of a judge's job can AI do?**

In O\*NET's description of the work, the parts that overlap most with what AI handles well are processing information, documenting/recording information and evaluating information to determine compliance with standards. The parts that hold up best are performing for or working directly with the public, face-to-face discussions and dealing with the public. These come from O\*NET ratings of how important each activity is to the job, read through NueCareer's AI-resilience method.

**Is being a judge a safe career from AI?**

On NueCareer's AI-resilience score, built from O\*NET work activities, judges score 16 out of 100, higher than 7% of the occupations we score. The job pays a median of $153,990 a year (BLS OEWS, May 2025). No job is fully safe from technological change, but the federal exposure category and the projected openings are the two numbers worth weighing.

Full profile: https://nuecareer.com/careers/judge.

---

This bank includes information from the O\*NET 31.0 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). O\*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. NueCareer has transformed the data by joining it to BLS wage and projection data and deriving facet, personality-fit and AI-resilience scores. BLS and BEA data are public domain (17 U.S.C. §105).

O\*NET content is used under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). How these figures are sourced and derived: https://nuecareer.com/careers/methodology